Monday, February 25, 2013

McCain: Obama should have Camp David budget summit

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Sen. John McCain says President Barack Obama should invite lawmakers to Camp David or the White House to hammer out a last-minute deal to avert deep budget cuts set to start taking effect at week's end.

The Arizona Republican says Obama should be talking with lawmakers instead of demonizing them over the looming across-the-board cuts in domestic and defense spending.

McCain calls the Pentagon cuts "unconscionable" and says military leaders are already warning they would be devastating.

McCain, the 2008 GOP president nominee, says it's time for Obama to show leadership and call lawmakers either to Camp David or to the White House for a budget summit.

McCain appeared on CNN's "State of the Union."

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/f70471f764144b2fab526d39972d37b3/Article_2013-02-24-US-Budget-Battle-McCain/id-6fefe922ab8f4d4da2b2c87a0896e01a

iOS 6 Features big brother Shakira iOS 6 bank of america Yunel Escobar Eye Black Cruel Summer

Samsung Launches iPad mini Competitor, the Galaxy Note 8.0 [PICS]

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://forums.iphoneincanada.ca/showthread.php?14448-Samsung-Launches-iPad-mini-Competitor-the-Galaxy-Note-8.0-PICS&goto=newpost

weightless ellen degeneres jcpenney yeardley love nba all star reserves rock center christine christine

Sunday, February 24, 2013

10 Celebrity Bodies We Need To Stop Talking About

  • Adele

    <strong>Lose It:</strong> "The thing at the moment is Adele. She is a little too fat, but she has a beautiful face and a divine voice," <a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-body/news/karl-lagerfeld-adele-is-too-fat-201262">Karl Lagerfield snarked</a> about the British singing sensation. Grammy-award-winning singer, Grammy winner, Oscar nominee and poster girl for bringing back the bouffant. <strong>Love It:</strong> Adele Laurie Blue Adkins, who admits the Spice Girls were her first inspiration, was first discovered on MySpace in 2006. From there, she went on to become one of the most successful singers of all time, winning nine Grammy Awards, 12 Billboard Music Awards (including Artist of the Year twice), a Golden Globe Award, and an Oscar nomination. But that's not even the best part: The new mom requires all backstage visitors to make a minimum $20 donation to Sands, a British charity that helps people deal with the death of a baby. Who cares what her dress size is when she collects $13,000 for charity -- in one night? <strong>Live It:</strong> Don't let the big (or little) people bring you down. People's words only have as much power as you give them.

  • Jennifer Hudson

    <strong>Lose It:</strong> First called "too fat" for Hollywood, <em>American Idol</em> finalist Jennifer Hudson made headlines when she dropped more than 80 pounds as a spokeswoman for Weight Watchers. Then, proving that nothing is ever good enough, critics called her "too thin." With so much buzz about her body, we might remember the talented singer best for the 20 seconds of "Believe" she belts out in the commercial. <strong>Love It: </strong>With an Oscar, a Golden Globe, a BAFTA, a NAACP image, and a Screen Actors Guild award tucked under her chic belt, the singer-actress proves she is so much more powerful than a number on the scale. When a personal tragedy rocked Hudson's world (her mother, brother and nephew brutally murdered in 2008), she showed us her true mettle as she dealt with a private tragedy in a very public way. In 2012 she released her autobiography that focuses partly on how she stays optimistic no matter what life throws at her. <strong>Live It:</strong> Sometimes we aim to change the world only to find the world has changed us; the trick is how you deal with it. Optimism is a gift worth far more than a designer dress in a sample size.

  • Kate Winslet

    <strong>Lose It:</strong> Ever since <em>Titanic</em> launched Kate Winslet into the spotlight, her weight has been a popular topic of discussion, mainly because she refuses to apologize for any "imperfections" and goes out of her way to publicly promote a healthy body image. In 2003, when she appeared on the cover of GQ looking trimmed down to Barbie proportions, Winslet issued a statement decrying the photo as fake, saying, "I just didn't want people to think I was a hypocrite and that I'd suddenly lost 30 pounds or whatever." <strong>Love It:</strong> The multiple Academy Award winner has received accolades not just for her acting but also for her work in children's literacy. She also showed her bravery when she helped rescue several people from a burning home during a vacation on Necker Island in 2011. Then, inspired by <em>A Mother's Courage: Talking Back to Autism</em>, the 2010 documentary she narrated, she founded the Golden Hat foundation, a charity that aims to "eliminate barriers for people with autism." <strong>Live It:</strong> Find something to be passionate about and then immerse yourself in it. It won't feel like work if you love it.

  • Victoria Beckham

    <strong>Lose It:</strong> The rumors of starvation diets, surgery, and eating disorders have swirled around Victoria Beckham for years, as people speculate about how she maintains her super slim figure. While the singer-turned-fashion-designer is fairly tight-lipped about the subject, she did say that she's not perfect and tends to get "obsessive" about her six-days-a-week fitness regimen. <strong>Love It:</strong> Beckham has worked incredibly hard to establish her fashion brand and has gotten many accolades in recent years for her creative designs, but it's with children where she really shines. Being a mum of four is an accomplishment in its own right, but over the past five years, she and her soccer legend husband, David Beckham, have donated more than 1 million dollars to buy specialized wheelchairs for disabled children. <strong>Live It:</strong> Don't be afraid to try something new, even when everyone tells you that you shouldn't. And then don't apologize when you prove them all wrong.

  • Jessica Simpson

    <strong>Lose It:</strong> Pregnant. Not pregnant. Pregnant again. With a highly publicized deal with Weight Watchers to lose her baby weight, Jessica Simpson's body has been the topic of more conversations than the number of hair extensions she's sold. Does anyone even remember she started out as a singer? <strong>Love It:</strong> While the world has been discussing the implications of her speedy second pregnancy on her weight-loss deal (she broke up with Weight Watchers), Simpson has been quietly building an empire of clothing, shoes, handbags, and her eponymous hair line. Not to mention launching her show <em>Fashion Star</em>. But the fashion star herself is about more than just heels and hair; the mom of one (with number two on the way!) sponsors an orphanage in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico which she visits often, once even giving them her own SUV as a gift. <strong>Live It</strong>: Life is about balance but you can be a mom, have a job you love, and be healthy. It's not about perfection, it's about being happy.

  • Oprah

    <strong>Lose It:</strong> Oprah Winfrey defined the relationship between celebrity scales and the media, being one of the first to publicly put her own dieting and body image struggles up for discussion. Of her famous Vogue cover shoot (she was the first black woman to land the coveted spot) she explained, "If you want to be on the cover of Vogue and editor-in-chief Anna Wintour says you have to be down to 150 pounds -- that's what you gotta do." <strong>Love It:</strong> While the talk-show host admits to many painful moments, she was also at the forefront of teaching women how to love their bodies and take care of them by establishing a respected cadre of experts, doctors, nutritionists, and life coaches, including the now-famous Dr. Oz, Dr. Weil, and Dr. Phil. She's also known for her hugely generous spirit and many philanthropic activities, including a girl's school in South Africa. <strong>Live It:</strong> Life is not a competition. Bringing others up only lifts us as well.

  • Jennifer Lawrence

    <strong>Lose It:</strong> Criticized for not looking ?hungry enough? to be the star of the action franchise <em>The Hunger Games</em>, actress Jennifer Lawrence has embraced all the body talk with humor and placidity. "In Hollywood, I'm obese,? the gorgeous Oscar nominee said in one interview while simultaneously dismissing any idea of dieting. <strong>Love It:</strong> Lawrence, while still maintaining a busy and diverse career as an actress, also strives to be a healthy role model to other girls. And she walks her own talk. Showing girls that they'll get further by focusing on their dreams than their waistlines, she said dryly, "I'd rather look chubby on screen and like a person in real life." <strong>Live It:</strong> Worry more about what you do and less about how you look doing it.

  • Kate Middleton

    <strong>Lose It:</strong> Just like her mother-in-law, Princess Diana, before her, Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton is subjected to media scrutiny over every ounce she gains or loses. Her apparent slim-down right before her 2011 ?wedding of the century? to heir apparent Prince William, was decried as an eating disorder by countless newspaper and magazine articles (Stress from having to plan the "wedding of the century," perhaps?). But when the private princess recently announced her pregnancy, tabloids responded by stalking her on holiday until they got photos of her protruding belly. <strong>Love It:</strong> Middleton, like many of her royal clan, is known for her humanitarian work and is often photographed visiting sick children or helping improve art programs in British schools. But what's even more telling of her generous nature is that when she got married, rather than accepting lavish gifts from admirers worldwide, she and William instead started a gift fund that supported 26 of their favorite charities, benefiting everything from the armed forces, children, and the elderly, to art, sports and conservation. <strong>Live It:</strong> It?s wonderful to recieve, but it feels even better to be able to give! And you don?t have to be a Duchess to help out your local school or veteran?s association.

  • Sonia Sotomayor

    <strong>Lose It: </strong>Justice Sonia Sotomayor got a lot of attention when President Obama first nominated her for the US Supreme Court in 2009. She would be the court?s first Hispanic and third female justice. Unfortunately rather than dwell on her many accomplishments, many people focused in on her weight. One Salon.com article asked ?How do you say 55, overweight, and diabetic in Spanish?? and implied she would be unfit to rule because of her ill health prospects. (Sotomayor was diagnosed with Type I diabetes as a child and it is not caused by weight gain.) <strong>Love It:</strong> Since becoming a public figure, Justice Sotomayor has given hundreds of speeches, mainly to women?s and ethnic groups, encouraging them to overcome negative stereotypes and be smart, strong, and politically active. Her 2013 memoir, <em>My Beloved World</em>, is published in both Spanish and English and details her difficult childhood in the New York housing projects. Today she lives in the U-Street Corridor, a neighborhood in Washington D.C. that was once known as ?the black broadway? and today is still one of the most ethnically and economically diverse areas in the region, because she says it reminds her of home. <strong>Live It: </strong>Never be ashamed of your roots. You are who you are because of your past, not in spite of it.

  • Steve Jobs

    <strong>Lose It:</strong> By the end of his life Steve Jobs was more talked about for his obsession with eating apples than for his genius making Apple. Ashton Kutcher, who plays the tech wizard in an upcoming movie, has said that eating Jobs' strict vegetarian diet put him in the hospital. And even before news of his terminal cancer surfaced, Jobs was often singled out for his gaunt appearance. <strong>Love It:</strong> During his 56 years, Jobs was credited as being the "father of the personal computer" and for revolutionizing the tech, phone, music, and movie industries. So next time you pull up Finding Nemo on your iPad to keep your kid occupied while you get some work e-mails answered on your iPhone, remember Jobs for his genius and not his jeans. <strong>Live It: </strong>Think big thoughts. Don't dismiss anything as "crazy".

  • Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/24/celebrity-bodies-weight_n_2725636.html

    Spain Vs Italy Euro 2012 Pepco erin andrews erin andrews tour de france Magic Mike Anderson Cooper Gay

    Wednesday, February 20, 2013

    Dot Earth Blog: Can Humans Do Better Than Dinosaurs When it Comes to Incoming Space Objects?

    Can humans do better than the dinosaurs?

    This is one of a string of questions I posed in a Skype chat on Sunday with Russell L. Schweickart, the Apollo 9 astronaut who has become a leading proponent of investing in tools that can spot and deflect earthbound asteroids and other orbiting threats. We spoke shortly after the cosmic coincidence on Feb. 15, when a long-projected close flyby by the DA14 asteroid was upstaged by the meteor that disintegrated over Siberia.

    Schweickart, along with former space shuttle astronaut Edward Lu and others, has for years pursued the goal of creating the technological capacity (through a privately financed Sentinel space telescope mission) and encouraging governmental responsibility (through discussions with NASA, the United Nations and other relevant entities) to address this long-understood, but largely discounted, threat.

    My first question was whether Schweickart saw the cosmic events last week as changing the equation. He was hopeful but doubtful.

    Below you can read transcribed portions of our conversation, including Schweickart?s views on why developing a system for spotting and deflecting near-Earth objects has been a tough sell both at NASA and in Congress.

    For a closer look at the planetary-protection efforts of Schweickart, Lu and their allies, I encourage you to read William J. Broad?s recent feature, ?Vindication for Entrepreneurs Watching Sky: Yes, It Can Fall.?

    I also recommend Lu?s TEDx talk on the Sentinel space telescope project, and explore background posted by the B612 Foundation, the group co-founded by Lu, Schweickart and others, first to explore deflection options and, since 2011, focused on the telescope mission.

    My central question for Schweickart was:

    Can we be smarter than the dinosaurs? We clearly have the foresight to recognize this is possible but now can we actually be smarter? Intelligence is taking knowledge and doing something with it.

    He replied:

    We clearly have both the knowledge and the capability to protect the Earth from these impacts. The bigger question is will we really recognize our shared interest in survival to cooperate internationally to make decisions and protect life on earth?. We?re broken into nations and tribes of all kinds and sizes and whether we can recognize our common humanity to the point where we do better than the dinosaurs, there?s not a clear answer to that.

    He laid out the three-pronged approach that?s required:

    There are three fundamental elements to protecting the Earth from these things.

    Number one is having adequate early warning. That?s what our Project Sentinel infrared telescope is all about.

    The second one is once you know something?s coming at you, you have to have a way to prevent it, and that?s deflection. And right now, while we know how to deflect ? and the B612 Foundation was a major cohort in developing those capabilities ? nevertheless it?s never been demonstrated?. Public safety is a fundamental responsibility of government everywhere. And to me NASA needs to be given the clear responsibilty to protect the earth from a predicted impact.

    And the third is the most challenging issue: the international coordination?. The easiest way to state it is that you can?t deflect an asteroid without putting temporarily at risk other nations and people who were not initially threatened? that international complexity says there has to be some ultimately we may watch ourselves get hit with the first one that threatens, hopefully in the ocean, while everybody is still debating at the U.N. But hopefully that will only happen once.

    I recalled how, in 2004, Schweickart described a Senate hearing on strategies for spotting and deflecting near-Earth objects as a sad affair in which lawmakers were concerned publicly, but privately said there was no way to get the money for an ambitious program. Why is planetary protection seen as a boondoggle, I asked?

    He replied:

    It?s not officially on anybody?s to-do list in terms of legal requirements. NASA does have a legal requirement to discover asteroids and to do certain research work, track them and catalog them, etc., but NASA does not have responsibility nor does anyone else, to protect the Earth from potential impacts. This is really public safety. This is not science or exploration. It?s always been a sad sister.

    He said the Siberian meteor blast might boost prospects, but was doubtful it would have a lasting effect on spending, particularly given other pressures in Washington:

    Given the financial situation in the federal government, not to mention the tremendous partisan contention going on, and the sequestration and everything else, this is a tough time for anybody to propose spending money that isn?t already committed.

    Schweickart added that?s where the Sentinel mission, for which the nonprofit B612 Foundation is trying to raise $450 million, comes in:

    It?s one of the nice things about being a private entity. We can focus on something that?s of very great importance and we can see it through, notwithstanding the rapidly changing political environment.

    He concluded by describing how the Sentinel mission could, within a decade, identify a huge number of orbiting objects that cannot be detected now but could have the destructive power of the Tunguska object, which exploded over Siberia in 1908, flattening hundreds of square miles of forest.

    If we can get our B612 telescope into orbit by 2018, by the time we get to 2020, 2022, we?ll have something like 50 percent of the Tunguska-size objects ? things like DA14 [the 50-meter-diameter asteroid that passed between Earth and some satellites on Friday]. Having 50 percent is a lot better than what we have now which is less than one half of one percent of objects that size. These are not panic situations, but they can hit any day, as we found out last Friday.

    Source: http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/20/can-humans-do-better-than-dinosaurs-when-it-comes-to-incoming-space-objects/?partner=rss&emc=rss

    new world trade center kellen moore ryan braun bryce harper may day stoudemire jordan hill

    BOJ board rift may delay new governor's policy ambitions

    TOKYO (Reuters) - A rift among Bank of Japan board members over how to achieve the new 2 percent inflation target means the central bank's next governor may have to move more cautiously than markets expect in stimulating the economy.

    Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has demanded bold action from the BOJ, raising expectations the next governor will shake up policy and finally manage what previous governors have not - to jump start an economy that has stagnated for years.

    But sources familiar with central bank thinking said that while the central bank may well ease policy under an existing asset-buying program, fresh ideas to expand the balance sheet more aggressively may be months away.

    That's because the new governor will face the challenge of trying to reach consensus on a board split over the feasibility of seeking a 2 percent inflation target and how best to achieve it, they said. They declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue.

    Incumbent BOJ Governor Masaaki Shirakawa and his two deputies step down on March 19. The BOJ will hold its first policy meeting under a new leadership on April 3-4 if parliamentary approval of Abe's nominees goes smoothly.

    To keep easing policy, the meeting will have little choice but to continue with the steps already adopted of boosting asset purchases and buying government bonds, analysts said. Anything more ambitious is unlikely.

    "What we have now is a very fragmented board, confused on what the BOJ is really trying to achieve. Reaching a consensus will be tough," said Hideo Kumano, chief economist at Dai-ichi Life Research Institute in Tokyo.

    Under pressure from Abe, the central bank agreed in January to double its inflation target to 2 percent and committed to "open ended" asset buying from 2014.

    His persistent pressure to shift the central bank to more aggressive action has driven the yen down to a 33-month low against the dollar, lifted share prices and given the export-reliant economy hope of relief from the fourth recession since 2000.

    The BOJ board will be dominated by those in favor of further easing but that is about where consensus ends.

    It is split on everything else, including the feasibility of trying to achieve 2 percent inflation in an economy that has rarely seen prices rise to that level, except for blips caused by tax hikes or a spike in energy costs.

    BOARD SPLIT

    Board members Takehiro Sato and Takahide Kiuchi voted against the BOJ's decision in January to double the inflation target. They felt 2 percent inflation was not sustainable in Japan, minutes of the meeting released on Tuesday show.

    "Even if the central bank were to set 2 percent inflation as a target, this alone was highly unlikely to have a substantial influence on inflation expectations," they were quoted as saying in the minutes.

    That contrasted with the BOJ's official line that by setting a new inflation target, the central bank could show its resolve to beat deflation and alter public expectations that prices will continue to fall.

    The two dissenters are not necessarily opposed to further easing. They voted with the board at the same January meeting on the decision to make an "open-ended" commitment to buy assets from next year.

    But there is hardly any consensus on how the BOJ should try to beat deflation, which has weighed on the economy for so long that consumer expectations of falling prices are entrenched.

    Some board members want the BOJ to focus on nudging down longer-term interest rates by buying longer-dated government bonds, the sources say. A reduction in longer-term interest rates might encourage longer-term lending and thus investment in the economy, the thinking goes.

    Others prefer scrapping a 0.1 percent floor set by the central bank on money market rates, or want the central bank to buy treasury discount bills forcefully. Both measures would be aimed at pushing down short-term rates and to help weaken the yen.

    Policymaker Ryuzo Miyao, a former academic, proposed strengthening the BOJ's commitment to ultra-easy monetary policy by pledging to keep interest rates virtually at zero until 2 percent inflation is in sight. That would be more binding than the BOJ's current commitment to maintain zero rates and asset purchases "for as long as needed."

    Miyao's idea was turned down at a policy review last week.

    The more unorthodox step of buying foreign bonds is fading as a near-term possibility as Japan faces heat from fellow members of the Group of 20 leading economies.

    The fall in the yen has already sparked concern Japan's policies could encourage competitive currency devaluations, although the G20 refrained from directly criticizing Japan at a financial leaders' meeting last weekend.

    Even Sato, initially an advocate of buying foreign bonds, has toned down his calls and stressed the hurdles that must be met, such as seeking global consent for such a step. Foreign bond buying is considered a more radical option for the central bank because it would be seen as tantamount to currency intervention.

    "Given the global debate surrounding Japan, it may be hard for the BOJ to consider buying foreign bonds," said one source.

    So while the BOJ may well ease policy as early as in April, it is likely to opt for another increase in its asset-buying program, rather than a new measure, analysts say.

    Indeed, the sources said that given the board split, new ideas for policies may be months away.

    The BOJ might also extend the duration of government bonds it targets under its asset-buying program to five years from the current three years, an option floated by a few board members in January as a way to pressure the longer end of the yield curve.

    For the time being, the only realistic option left for the central bank may be to continue buying government bonds, said one of the sources.

    "The only question is how aggressively it will do this."

    (Reporting by Leika Kihara; Editing by Neil Fullick)

    Source: http://news.yahoo.com/boj-board-rift-may-delay-governors-policy-ambitions-102958842--business.html

    tulsa shooting doug fister rick warren the perfect storm hard boiled eggs mickelson how to tie a tie

    Dr. Steve Hammond leaving Florida TaxWatch Center for Smart Justice

    Today, Florida TaxWatch announced the resignation of Steven Hammond as the TaxWatch Center for Smart Justice Executive Director, effective immediately.

    Dominic M. Calabro, Florida TaxWatch President and CEO said, ?Steve has brought an intense personal connection to the issue of criminal and juvenile justice, and will continue to work with Florida?s inmates through his prison ministry services. The TaxWatch Center for Smart Justice has been in good hands under Steve?s leadership, and will continue to advance its very successful work.??

    Dr. Hammond, in announcing his resignation, stated, ?I sincerely appreciate the opportunities I have been given at Florida TaxWatch. I have enjoyed the relationships both within TaxWatch and the community of stakeholders across Florida who are committed to justice reform. I was extremely fortunate to be supported by an advisory board of true professionals, each and everyone of whom was and is fully committed to advocating creative and innovative ways to promote justice reform, improve public safety, and reduce the taxpayers? burden. I feel that it is time for me to move on to pursue other interests and opportunities, not the least of which is further commitment to prison ministry.??

    The Center will continue its work, and will conduct an extensive search for its new Executive Director over the next four months. In the interim, the important work of the Center will continue through the dedicated efforts of TaxWatch Center for Smart Justice researcher Nathan Waible, and others, under the direction of Robert Weissert, Vice President for Research and General Counsel.

    Source: http://www.saintpetersblog.com/dr-steve-hammond-leaving-florida-taxwatch-center-for-smart-justice

    nevada caucus ufc 143 what time does the super bowl start super bowl 2012 josephine baker ben gazzara nfl hall of fame 2012

    Tuesday, February 19, 2013

    Ecuador President Rafael Correa sails to re-election on vows to deepen welfare reforms, but is it sustainable?

    QUITO, Ecuador A landslide second re-election secured, President Rafael Correa immediately vowed to deepen the "citizen's revolution" that has lifted tens of thousands of Ecuadoreans out of poverty as he expanded the welfare state.

    "In this revolution the citizens are in charge, not capital," the leftist U.S.-trained economist said after winning 56.9 percent of the vote Sunday against 23.8 percent for his closest challenger, longtime banker Guillermo Lasso.

    With 57 percent of the vote counted, former President Lucio Gutierrez finished third with 6 percent. The remainder was divided among five other candidates. Lasso conceded defeat late Sunday.

    The fiery-tongued Correa has brought surprising stability to an oil-exporting nation of 14.6 million with a history of unruliness that cycled through seven presidents in the decade before him.

    With the help of oil prices that have hovered around $100 a barrel, he has raised lower-class living standards and widened the welfare state with region-leading social spending.

    The 48-year-old Correa dedicated his victory to his cancer-stricken friend President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, who some analysts have suggested he could succeed as the standard-bearer of Latin America's left.

    "We are only here to serve you. Nothing for us. Everything for you," Correa told cheering supporters from the balcony of the Carondelet presidential palace Sunday shortly after polls closed.

    Yet Correa has also drawn wide rebuke for intolerance of dissent and some analysts have questioned how sustainable his economic policies are. The number of people working for the government has burgeoned from 16,000 to 90,000 during Correa's current term if office, Ecuador's nongovernmental Observatory of Fiscal Policy reported in December.

    Michael Shifter, president of the Inter-American Dialogue think tank, called Correa's ramping up of social spending "simply applying the standard recipe for many populist governments in the region." While it succeeds in building political support in the short term, he said, it is not clear whether it is sustainable.

    And while Correa has shown himself to be the "undisputed rhetorical leader of Latin America's left" ? and should now see his standing enhanced there ? Shifter said Correa's consolidation of power has damaged Ecuador's "already precarious institutions" and he lacks the clout, the ambition and the coffers to build a coalition that could curtail U.S. power in the region.

    Correa's result Sunday easily topped the 51.7 percent that he won in his first re-election in April 2009. He is barred by the constitution from another 4-year term.

    While a practitioner of one-man rule in the Chavez mold, he is more respectful of private property.

    Ecuador relies on petroleum for more than half of its export earnings, and he has used this oil wealth to make public education and health care more accessible, and lay thousands of miles of new highways.

    Foreign investment has suffered, however, and Lasso, the former head of the Banco de Guayaquil, ran on a platform of guaranteeing multinational businesses more favorable terms, such as abolishing a 5 percent tax on capital removed from Ecuador.

    Correa said he's happy to have more foreign investment but "it's better not to have it than to mortgage the country in the name of that pipe dream called foreign investment."

    He did not explain, meanwhile, how he planned to pay for efforts to "quicken and deepen" poverty reduction. Skeptical economists say the state can't afford it without major new revenue sources.

    Such talk doesn't dim the enthusiasm for Correa of the likes of Jomaira Espinosa.

    "Before (Correa), my family didn't have enough to eat" and her father couldn't find work, the 18-year-old said. Now her father has a job as a public servant and she expects to be able to study for free at a university thanks to Correa's programs.

    Since Correa took office in 2007, the United Nations says Ecuador's poverty rate has dropped nearly five percentage points to 32.4 percent. In all, 1.9 million people receive $50 a month in aid from the state. Critics complain that the handouts to single mothers, needy families and the elderly poor, along with other subsidies, have bloated the government.

    Civil liberties, meantime, have suffered.

    Correa has been widely condemned for using criminal libel law against opposition news media and for such strong-arm tactics as seizing Ecuador's airwaves virtually at will to spread his political gospel and attack opponents.

    German Calapucha, a 29-year-old accountant, said he voted against Correa because he's tired of the president's imperiousness.

    "He thinks that because he wins elections he has the right to mistreat people," Calapucha said.

    Correa has eroded the influence not just of opposition political parties but also of the Roman Catholic Church and independent news media. He has stacked courts with friendly judges and prosecuted indigenous leaders for organizing protests against Correa's attempt to open up Ecuador to large-scale mining without their consent.

    Meanwhile, Correa has been unable to stop a growing sensation of vulnerability in a country where robberies and burglaries grew 30 percent in 2012 compared with the previous year.

    The graduate of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign gained an early reputation as a maverick, defying international financiers by defaulting on $3.9 billion in foreign debt obligations and rewriting contracts with oil multinationals to secure a higher share of oil revenues for Ecuador.

    He has also kept the United States at arm's length while upsetting Britain and Sweden in August by granting asylum at the Ecuadorean Embassy in London to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, the online spiller of leaked U.S. government secrets who is wanted for questioning in Sweden for alleged sexual assault.

    Correa has, meanwhile, cozied up to U.S. rivals Iran and China. The latter is the biggest buyer of Ecuador's oil and holds $3.4 billion in Ecuadorean debt, according to Finance Minister Patricio Rivera.

    Source: http://feeds.cbsnews.com/~r/cbsnews/feed/~3/uz-AiVKRLfo/

    xbox live update joan rivers gary carter dies oolong tea survivor one world lil kim progeria