Friday, March 9, 2012

$100 or $1,000? Wide price range for birth control

(AP) ? What does birth control really cost anyway?

It varies dramatically, from $9 a month for generic pills to $90 a month for some of the newest brands ? plus a doctor's visit for the prescription.

Want a more goof-proof option? The most reliable contraceptives, so-called long-acting types like IUDs or implants, can cost $600 to nearly $1,000 upfront to be inserted by a doctor.

That's if you don't have insurance that covers at least some of the tab ? although many women do. And if those prices are too much, crowded public clinics offer free or reduced-price options. But it might take a while to get an appointment.

Questions about cost and access to birth control have been swirling for weeks now, intensifying after a Georgetown University law school student testified before congressional Democrats in support of a new federal policy to pay for contraception that she said can add up to $1,000 a year, not covered by the Jesuit college's health plan. Talk show host Rush Limbaugh's verbal assault on her comments became the latest skirmish in the birth control wars.

Soon, the new policy will make contraceptives available free of charge as preventive care, just like mammograms, for women with most employer-provided health insurance. Churches are exempt. But for other religious-affiliated organizations, such as colleges or hospitals, their insurance companies would have to pay for the coverage, something that has triggered bitter political debate.

A major study of nearly 10,000 women that's under way in St. Louis provides a tantalizing clue about what might happen when that policy takes effect.

Consider: Nearly half of the nation's 6 million-plus pregnancies each year are unintended. Rates of unplanned pregnancies are far higher among low-income women than their wealthier counterparts. Among the reasons is that condoms can fail. So can birth control pills if the woman forgets to take them every day or can't afford a refill.

Only about 5 percent of U.S. women use the most effective contraceptives ? a matchstick-sized implant named Implanon or intrauterine devices known as IUDs. Once inserted, they prevent pregnancy for three, five or 10 years. But Dr. Jeffrey Peipert of Washington University in St. Louis says many women turn them down because of a higher upfront cost that insurance hasn't always covered even though years of pills eventually cost as much.

"How can we cover Viagra and not IUDs?" wonders Peipert, who is leading the new study.

Called the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, the study is providing those options and a range of others for free. Participants also can choose from birth control pills, a monthly patch, a monthly vaginal ring and a once-every-three-months shot. They're told the pros and cons of each but that the long-lasting options have a lower failure rate.

About 75 percent of women in the study are choosing the IUD or the implant, Peipert says. After the first year of the ongoing study, more than 80 percent of the women who chose the long-acting contraceptives are sticking with them compared with about half the pill users, he says.

According to the Guttmacher Institute, the average woman who has two children will spend three decades trying to avoid an unintended pregnancy. The Institute of Medicine says that's one reason that women tend to incur higher out-of-pocket costs for preventive care than men.

Yes, there already are some options for more affordable contraception, such as public clinics or Planned Parenthood.

About 55 percent of local health departments offer some family planning services, according to the National Association of County & City Health Officials. Many of those receive federal Title X funding, which means they can offer contraception on a sliding fee scale. The poorest women may get it free, while others may pay full price or somewhere in between.

There are cheaper generic pills. Peipert says there's little difference between them and pricey new brand-name versions like Yaz.

But some women go through a number of brands before finding one that doesn't cause uncomfortable side effects, says Sarah Brown of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. Her organization operates a website, http://www.bedsider.org , that details options along with the price range.

"Not every woman can use generic pills, by any means," Brown says. "Do we say to people, 'Just go get generic cardiac medicines. Hope that works out for you?'"

Peipert notes that contraception is cheaper than what insurers or taxpayer-funded Medicaid pay for prenatal care and delivery. He says economic studies have found that every $1 spent on family planning can save nearly $4 in expenditures on unintended pregnancy.

Do women ask about the price?

"Oh, my gosh, absolutely," exclaims obstetrician-gynecologist Dr. Monica Dragoman of New York's Montefiore Medical Center.

Just last week, she saw a woman whose heart condition could make another pregnancy life-threatening but who couldn't afford the IUD that Dragoman wanted to prescribe, and chose a cheaper option.

If a family's already struggling financially, "sometimes contraception is one of the first things to fall off," Dragoman says.

___

EDITOR'S NOTE ? Lauran Neergaard covers health and medical issues for The Associated Press in Washington.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2012-03-09-HealthBeat-Birth%20Control/id-eef07303dc574658bb424878401b48e2

gloria allred black friday ads 2011 black friday ads 2011 pacquiao vs marquez pacquiao vs marquez junior dos santos junior dos santos

South Africa to be Showcased on 'Jeopardy ... - Travel World News

South African Tourism has announced an interactive ?Jeopardy!? game to educate and engage fans about South Africa through its website, www.SouthAfrica.net. The online game will launch on March 8 in conjunction with a special video category highlighting the destination with the ?Jeopardy!? Clue Crew. South African Tourism will also give away a 10-day luxury South African adventure to one lucky winner on the Facebook page Visit South Africa. Viewers will be encouraged through banner ads on the ?Jeopardy!? website and on-air mentions by Host Alex Trebek to enter for a chance to ?Leave Ordinary Behind? and experience a visit to South Africa.

?Jeopardy!? journeyed to South Africa, capturing its beauty and diversity, for categories to air this month, April and later this fall. ?It was a pleasure to have America?s top-rated quiz show explore South Africa,? said Sthu Zungu, President of South African Tourism. ?Popular shows like ?Jeopardy!? bring vital mainstream awareness about our amazing destination in an interactive, fun way. We?re thrilled to work with shows that aid us in our quest to educate the American traveler on all that South Africa has to offer.?

Tune-in to ?Jeopardy!? on March 8 to learn more about the sweepstakes. Viewers will be directed to www.southafrica.net to test their South Africa I.Q. The trip give-away will include round-trip airfare; three nights at the Table Bay Hotel in Cape Town; two nights on board the Rovos Rail; two nights at Fairlawn?s Boutique Hotel & Spa; two nights on safari at the luxury MalaMala Private Game Reserve; cultural tours and thrilling activities. The sweepstakes ends on March 22 at 7 p.m. EST.

South African Tourism, www.southafrica.net

Source: http://travelworldnews.com/2012/03/07/south-africa-to-be-showcased-on-jeopardy-beginning-march-8-luxury-trip-giveaway/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=south-africa-to-be-showcased-on-jeopardy-beginning-march-8-luxury-trip-giveaway

meet the press steelers vs broncos chris herren jay z calvin johnson calvin johnson patsy cline

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Online MLM Training: Are you frustrated with throwing your money ...

Online MLM training can be extremely difficult, not to mention expensive, if you don?t know what you?re doing. Facts reveal that the vast majority of MLM downline distributors will throw good money after bad just trying (and hoping) to make something stick. Of course, you?re natural instinct is to follow your upline, but they are usually just telling you to sell to your family or friends.

Although that can be a nice place to start, the reality is that nobody has enough friends and family to keep them going in this business. The percent of friends or family who would truly want your product? You?ll probably find that only about 2% of all your contact will prove to want your product. Most network marketers get frustrated enough with this picture to just walk away, usually after they?ve lost most of their money.

And, this is what makes online network marketing so difficult, as most MLM companies aren?t built for the internet, with no online MLM training program. The sad truth is that a lot of network companies actually attempt to keep you from marketing online.

Some people find think that buying prospecting lists are the answer. They spend their time and money calling one ?prospective customer? after the next, and getting more frustrated with every call. Some like the idea of email too, but this can wind up leading you into trouble if you?re pegged as a ?spammer?. Unfortunately, this is a big reason why online network marketing has a faulty name. Looking online will give you so much contrary information that it?s really baffling to know where to put your faith.

Finding the right kind of online MLM training can be tough, but worth it, because online marketing will be your friend in the end. In fact, the internet is actually the only way you can solicit to billions of prospects all over the globe with the least cost. The average network company website is not built to catch the attention of your prospects, and, of course, will never be seen unless you learn how to promote it with the right online MLM training.

The main reason why 98% of MLM reps fail in their MLM business is because they were never successful in any business! The sad truth is that numerous people connect with MLM companies to just satisfy their ?hope? or ?dream? of success. Any business owner can tell you that it take way more than hopes or dreams to grow a successful business. You need money, time, and most important, tenacity. Too many people try to promote their business online and soon give up with the attitude that it?s just not for them.

BUT ONLINE MARKETING DOES REALLY WORK!

If you want to succeed in your MLM business, let?s first examine by so many entrepreneurs fail in their business:

First, many new MLM business owners do exactly what their sponsors tell them to do?grab your friends and family and sell them?.schedule meetings and home parties. And, after spending much time and financial resources, they find the profit margin on this is limited, to say the least. ?THIS ISN?T WHAT MY SPONSOR PROMISED!? THEY THINK.

Secondly, a lot of network marketers are given no support or online MLM training from their upline.

Thirdly, most new entrepreneurs start out wrong when trying to push their opportunity?asking friends, ?can you do me a favor?? The fact is that positioning yourself as a helping friend rather than a pushy salesman is much more likely to get you those sales?.a little then call attraction marketing. This is one of the first things you?ll learn when you begin your venture with online MLM training. Hyping your product can actually turn people off!

Don?t be discouraged in your MLM business. It doesn?t have to be depressing. We actually can get the computers to help our business! In fact, it may be the only alternative to loosing money as an entrepreneur in the 21st century. The internet could be your best friend when given the right training and equipment. Just imagine collecting 19 checks per month, earning over $500 per day, personally sponsoring over 100 recruited reps in your business in less than 60 days! Maybe this seems all too good to be true? It?s natural for you to have your guard up when all you?ve ever known is the same old J-O-B and paycheck to paycheck. Promise yourself today to put a halt to throwing your money down the toilet on what isn?t working. Stop chasing your friends and family to ?do you a favor? and buy something out of your catalog. Now is the best time ever to make the technology of today?s world work FOR you and not AGAINST YOU! You don?t have to spend thousands of dollars to figure out how to build a network marketing business using the internet! Through attraction marketing, you can stop struggling today, and learn how to find the people who are already out there looking for your opportunity!

Now that you?re ready to learn the most powerful marketing techniques for online network marketing, and how to get an endless flow of leads with minimum financial outlay, simply go to the following link: online MLM training

Source: http://internetbasedbusinessarticles.com/129110/online-mlm-training-are-you-frustrated-with-throwing-your-money-away/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=online-mlm-training-are-you-frustrated-with-throwing-your-money-away

fugazi fugazi indiana jones and the last crusade nba lockout dramamine dramamine nba season

Monday, March 5, 2012

Feel cheated? Small claims court brings big wins

FILE - In this Tuesday, Jan. 3, 2012 file photo, Heather Peters, who says her 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid never achieved the gas mileage Honda claimed in its advertising, pleads her case in Small Claims Court in Torrrance, Calif. A few recent cases demonstrate that consumers can, if they're motivated enough, win small-claims cases against big companies. These "David versus Goliath" battles were won against the likes of AT&T, Honda and others without lawyers. The plaintiffs paid minor filing fees, gathered their own research and presented arguments in quick hearings that resemble the average "Judge Judy" episode. (AP Photo/Reed Saxon, File)

FILE - In this Tuesday, Jan. 3, 2012 file photo, Heather Peters, who says her 2006 Honda Civic Hybrid never achieved the gas mileage Honda claimed in its advertising, pleads her case in Small Claims Court in Torrrance, Calif. A few recent cases demonstrate that consumers can, if they're motivated enough, win small-claims cases against big companies. These "David versus Goliath" battles were won against the likes of AT&T, Honda and others without lawyers. The plaintiffs paid minor filing fees, gathered their own research and presented arguments in quick hearings that resemble the average "Judge Judy" episode. (AP Photo/Reed Saxon, File)

(AP) ? If you feel cheated by a big company and complaining gets you nowhere, what can you do? A handful of recent cases suggest that consumers can, if they're motivated enough, win against big companies in small claims courts.

These "David versus Goliath" battles were won against the likes of AT&T, Honda and others, without resorting to lawyers. The plaintiffs paid minor filing fees, gathered their own research and presented arguments in quick hearings that resemble the average "Judge Judy" episode.

And now, thanks to the Internet, these victors are connecting with other consumers in hopes of helping them replicate their successes. If the practice catches on, it could amount to a big bucks difference in payouts by these giant corporations.

"It is a significant undertaking," says Heather Peters of Los Angeles, who sued Honda because her Civic Hybrid didn't meet its claims for gas mileage. She won $9,867 last month.

"But with the Internet, it's a whole different world," said Peters, a former lawyer who just reactivated her license. "It just takes one or two people like us who are the anal-retentive, compulsive people to do all the work, and are magnanimous enough to say: 'Here you are! Go get 'em. You do it, too!'"

Other success stories include Matt Spaccarelli of Simi Valley, Calif., and Henry Brown of New York, who both sued AT&T Inc.

Brown won $1,587.50 in October after suing the telecommunications giant for frequently dropping his wireless calls and charging him an early termination fee when he wanted to get out of his contract.

Spaccarelli was awarded $850 last week after successfully suing AT&T for slowing down the data service on his iPhone when he hit a limit for downloads, even though he had an "unlimited data" plan.

Peters and Spaccarelli have both put up websites that feature copies of the documents they used in court.

Peters says hundreds of people have expressed interest, and she knows of at least six consumers who have filed cases. Dozens of people have contacted Spaccarelli, and he recently filed suit on behalf of his brother, who has the same problem with his iPhone.

Their victories aren't necessarily final. Honda says it will appeal Peters' award, and AT&T is appealing Spaccarelli's. But the new hearings will basically be reruns of the first ones. They will feature similar and relatively informal rules. So there's no way the companies can use their resources to take a small claims case to a jury trial and force the consumer to rack up enormous legal fees.

The small claims process is by no means easy. For Brown and Spaccarelli, the hearings were harrowing. They felt intimidated by AT&T's representatives. AT&T's lawyer postponed Brown's hearing three times before agreeing to a hearing date, months after the suit was filed.

"He was just so vicious, and it actually scared me. I actually said to the judge, 'I don't feel safe sitting next to him. He's just on the full attack,'" Brown says. The judge was sympathetic but told Brown that lawyers don't have to act nice: "This isn't a tea party," he was told.

Peters started her case because she was dissatisfied with a class-action settlement in the works over the same issue ? the Honda Civic Hybrid's gas mileage. That settlement would give Civic owners $100 to $200 each, plus a rebate on a new Honda. Peters made out much better.

Should companies be scared of consumers heading to small claims courts? A quick calculation shows they should have cause for concern.

Honda's proposed class action settlement might cost the carmaker $40 million, if every one of the 200,000 Civic Hybrid owners claimed the maximum amount. But if all of the owners went to small claims court and fared as well as Peters, the company would be out nearly $2 billion.

"If corporations see a large number of people going to small claims, it might cut off their ability to have these relatively cheap dispositions of class actions," says Richard Cupp, a law professor at Pepperdine University in Malibu, Calif.

But while corporations have been fighting class actions, they don't seem very concerned about self-help justice through small claims. Paying off a few brave souls who head to small claims or arbitration is, after all, cheaper than settling class action suits.

"How many people would really do this?" Spaccarelli asks. "I'm just kind of pig-headed."

Companies are actually encouraging consumers to take their gripes to small claims courts. A clause in AT&T's contract, for instance, forbids customers from pursuing a jury trial or a class action. It points them instead to small claims court or arbitration. AT&T scored a victory on behalf of many companies when the Supreme Court upheld the clause last year.

"We strongly believe that small claims and arbitrations are viable options for concerned customers," AT&T spokesman Mark Siegel says. "With over 100 million customers, we expect to receive complaints from time to time, and we know that, in a few of those cases, a small claims judge or an arbitrator might make a decision that we think is wrong. That's OK."

There is scant data on the number of small claims cases filed in the U.S. each year or on the number of cases that feature consumers suing big companies. A study by the National Center for State Courts, published in 1992, found 40 percent of cases in the 12 courts studied were consumer complaints. The same study found that 67 percent of individuals suing businesses or government agencies won their cases.

The Internet makes it easier for consumers to band together and take their cases to small claims court, but that doesn't apply to arbitration cases, because they usually require parties to keep the outcome confidential. If companies direct more cases to arbitration, sharing of tips and documents among consumer plaintiffs would be stifled.

Consumer advocates have been critical of arbitration for another reason: The arbiters are effectively paid by the companies who funnel claims there. Mandatory arbitration clauses by credit card companies have been hotly contested by regulators, consumer groups and in court.

The Davids who take down Goliaths in small claims courts say it isn't about the money but the justice ? the satisfaction of getting even.

"What was worth the time was sticking it to AT&T. That was the end-all," Brown says. "Especially when, at the end, the lawyer came up to me and said, 'Congratulations, you made a great case.' I looked at him in disgust and walked away."

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/495d344a0d10421e9baa8ee77029cfbd/Article_2012-03-02-Small%20Claims%20vs%20Big%20Companies/id-09a82e955e3240398fae640ee197487a

weather nj nyc weather nyc weather philadelphia weather chris carpenter chris carpenter the brothers grimm

Wells Fargo to increase international operations: report (Reuters)

[unable to retrieve full-text content]Reuters - U.S. bank Wells Fargo has drawn up plans to build up its overseas operations and wants to expand into 20 markets worldwide, the Financial Times reported on Monday.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/business/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20120305/bs_nm/us_wellsfargo_expansion

aaron carter sister pfizer signing day 2012 football gasland college football recruiting bjork summerfest

Friday, March 2, 2012

How Obama Is Reviving L.A. Mayor Villaraigosa's Career (Time.com)

When he was a young man, Antonio Villaraigosa dropped out of school, was in numerous street fights and had a tattoo inked on his right arm that read: "Born to Raise Hell." In 2005 he became the first Latino mayor of Los Angeles since 1872. It was practically scripted: the inspirational tale of a troubled boy from the gang-infested Boyle Heights neighborhood of East L.A. who makes good, goes to city hall and turns Los Angeles into a "city of purpose."

But, until last week, the mayoral tale of Villaraigosa was starting to look like a box-office bomb. In 2007 came revelations of an extramarital affair with a Telemundo newscaster, which seriously hurt his popularity, particularly in the Latino community. His ambitious but ultimately misguided plan for a school-district takeover was defeated in court. A weakening economy and his unsystematic management style led to even more political stasis.

(MORE: Latino Voters by the Numbers)

Then last week, Villaraigosa's career got a resurrecting jolt when President Obama appointed him to be chairman of the September 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C. The choice was a mild surprise, even though the Democrats are focused on preserving their hold on the Latino vote as the key to victory in November ? the subject of the latest cover story of TIME. Back in 2008, Villaraigosa had famously endorsed Hillary Clinton over then candidate Obama during the Democratic primaries. While the chairmanship might not hold much real authority, it has already renewed national interest in the mayor, who runs a city that is 48% Latino. And the broader spotlight has allowed him to refresh his local reputation in the City of Angels, a place that hasn't exactly been like heaven for many residents lately.

The mayor's biography ? despite its blemishes ? remains his strongest asset. Villaraigosa came from a broken home, in which his father, a Mexican immigrant welder, routinely beat his mother. His father left his family when Antonio was a young boy, and Villaraigosa spent his teenage years in and out of school, getting into scraps and trying to make ends meet with jobs that included shining shoes, selling the daily newspaper La Opini?n and working at a car wash.

(PHOTOS: Election 2012: Faces of the Latino Vote by Marco Grob)

During his junior year of high school, Villaraigosa dropped out but returned at the encouragement of Herman Katz, his English teacher. After graduating from Theodore Roosevelt High School, Villaraigosa attended UCLA, where he received a history degree. He became a union organizer and then president of the Southern California branch of the American Civil Liberties Union before getting elected to the California state assembly in 1994. He served as speaker of the assembly from 1998 to 2000, then ran for mayor, lost but was elected to the city council. When he was finally elected mayor seven years ago, the excitement and expectations in Los Angeles during his inauguration, especially among Latinos, were infectious, if unrealistic. The telegenic mayor created much of the excitement. He made numerous grandiose promises, but his lack of understanding of the nuances of city politics and managerial experience hobbled him from the outset. There was a sense that the mayor's office was unfocused and that Villaraigosa's true passion was having his image appear on the local TV news. Then came the revelation of the affair with Mirthala Salinas of Telemundo. The Latino electorate, he tells TIME, "felt let down, more than with somebody else, but I'm in a great place with my family now, and I am proud of that."

Villaraigosa, 59, knows how to adjust his image. He's been doing it for years. Remember that "Born to Raise Hell" tattoo? He had it removed 15 years ago. "Peace, not war," he likes to say now. While he warmly welcomed the Obama appointment, its focus on his Hispanic heritage has also made him slightly uncomfortable. After all, he is the mayor of a huge city that is 52% non-Latino. "I reach out to a broad number of people, I am not seen as ... just as a Latino politician," he says. While he will be trumpeted for his Latino roots in the coming months, he says the "Latino politician" tag frustrates him. He takes pride that he represents all Angelenos "even though half of the people hate me," he laughs. "I am a coalition builder. I think that's the best way to serve the President. Will I also talk to Latinos? Of course! I speak Spanish. But I am comfortable in any community." He looks at this reporter, an Anglo, in the eye, smiles and says, "I am comfortable with you, my brother."

MORE: Why the Latino Vote in Arizona Could Be Decisive in 2012

'); } } // REQUIRED VALUES google_ad_client = 'ca-timeinc-time-bah'; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '3'; // OPTIONAL, USED google_ad_type = 'text'; // type of ads to display google_ad_channel = 'article'; google_safe = 'high'; // -->

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/us/*http%3A//us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/external/time_rss/rss_time_us/httpwwwtimecomtimenationarticle08599210765300htmlxidrssnationyahoo/44668253/SIG=12llde8m8/*http%3A//www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2107653,00.html?xid=rss-nation-yahoo

big east expansion google buzz trace cyrus hilary duff pregnant hilary duff pregnant psat psat